Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorApor, Balazsen
dc.contributor.authorO'REILLY, KLARA-MAEVEen
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-10T09:41:39Z
dc.date.available2017-08-10T09:41:39Z
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.date.submitted2017en
dc.identifier.citationO'REILLY, KLARA-MAEVE, Perspectives of collectivisation: Popular opinion and memory in saxony and lower silesia, 1948-1961, Trinity College Dublin.School of Lang, Lit. & Cultural Studies.RUSSIAN AND SLAVONIC STUDIES, 2017en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/81682
dc.descriptionAPPROVEDen
dc.description.abstractThe collectivisation of the East German and Polish agriculture in the 1950s and 1960s stands at the centre of this thesis. The diverging experiences of collectivisation in East Germany and Poland are investigated through contemporary party reports and present-day memories. The thesis aims to open new perspectives on the history of collectivisation in both countries by studying two hitherto neglected aspects: the every-day, standardised negotiation of popular opinion on the farms and the present-day memories of the period. Collectivisation in a transnational and comparative framework has so far only been rarely studies. Most work concentrates on the political and economic history of the policy. Contemporary memories of collectivisation also remain understudied while no attempt at placing (the memories of) collectivisation in the post-Communist discourse in central and eastern Europe has been undertaken so far. This PhD thesis fills this gap in the academic literature by combining the analysis of memories of collectivisation with the close reading of contemporary party and mood reports. On the collective farms, the opinions of peasants on socialist agriculture were based on local and economic circumstances which eventually condensed into a mosaic of personal attitudes which were context-bound and diverse. Saxon and Lower Silesian villagers and functionaries were heteroglossic and constantly engaged in the expression of statements whose meanings were similarly pluralist and context-sensitive. The most profound difference between the Saxon and Lower Silesian interviews lies in the relative position afforded to memories of collectivisation. In the Lower Silesian memories, experiences of collective farming do not occupy a prominent position and could be described as already transformed into historical knowledge. By contrast, the Saxon experiences of collectivised agriculture constitute an integral part in the autobiographies of the speakers.en
dc.publisherTrinity College Dublin. School of Lang, Lit. & Cultural Studies. Discipline of Russianen
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectCollectivisation, GDR, PRL, popular opinion, memory studiesen
dc.titlePerspectives of collectivisation: Popular opinion and memory in saxony and lower silesia, 1948-1961en
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.supercollectionthesis_dissertationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.type.qualificationlevelPostgraduate Doctoren
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/oreillklen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid175477en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record