dc.contributor.author | MURPHY, DEIRDRE | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-07T15:45:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-07T15:45:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en |
dc.date.submitted | 2014 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Ramphul M, Ooi PV, Burke G, Kennelly MM, Said SA, Montgomery AA, Murphy DJ, Instrumental delivery and ultrasound : a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery., BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 121, 8, 2014, 1029-38 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1470-0328 | en |
dc.identifier.other | Y | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2262/75510 | |
dc.description | PUBLISHED | en |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE:
To determine whether the use of ultrasound can reduce the incidence of incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position at instrumental delivery and subsequent morbidity.
DESIGN:
Two-arm, parallel, randomised trial, conducted from June 2011 to December 2012.
SETTING:
Two maternity hospitals in the Republic of Ireland.
SAMPLE:
A cohort of 514 nulliparous women at term (≥37 weeks of gestation) with singleton cephalic pregnancies, aiming to deliver vaginally, were recruited prior to an induction of labour or in early labour.
METHODS:
If instrumental delivery was required, women who had provided written consent were randomised to receive clinical assessment (standard care) or ultrasound scan and clinical assessment (ultrasound). [Correction added on 17 April 2014, after first online publication: Sentence was amended.]
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
Incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position.
RESULTS:
The incidence of incorrect diagnosis was significantly lower in the ultrasound group than the standard care group (4/257, 1.6%, versus 52/257, 20.2%; odds ratio 0.06; 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.19; P < 0.001). The decision to delivery interval was similar in both groups (ultrasound mean 13.8 minutes, SD 8.7 minutes, versus standard care mean 14.6 minutes, SD 10.1 minutes, P = 0.35). The incidence of maternal and neonatal complications, failed instrumental delivery, and caesarean section was not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
An ultrasound assessment prior to instrumental delivery reduced the incidence of incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position without delaying delivery, but did not prevent morbidity. A more integrated clinical skills-based approach is likely to be required to prevent adverse outcomes at instrumental delivery. | en |
dc.format.extent | 1029-38 | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 121 | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 8 | en |
dc.rights | Y | en |
dc.subject | Obstetrics | en |
dc.title | Instrumental delivery and ultrasound : a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery. | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.type.supercollection | scholarly_publications | en |
dc.type.supercollection | refereed_publications | en |
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurl | http://people.tcd.ie/murphyd4 | en |
dc.identifier.rssinternalid | 109663 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12810 | en |
dc.rights.ecaccessrights | openAccess | |
dc.identifier.orcid_id | 0000-0001-6074-6718 | en |