Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGARAVAN, HUGH PATRICKen
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-29T03:16:48Z
dc.date.available2008-03-29T03:16:48Z
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.date.submitted2007en
dc.identifier.citationLandau, S. M., Garavan, H., Schumacher, E.H., & D'Esposito, M., Regional specificity and practice: Dynamic changes in object and spatial working memory, Brain Research, 1180, 2007, 78, 89en
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/15178
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractWorking memory (WM) tasks engage a network of brain regions that includes primary, unimodal, and multimodal associative cortices. Little is known, however, about whether task practice influences these types of regions differently. In this experiment, we used event-related fMRI to examine practice-related activation changes in different region types over the course of a scanning session while participants performed a delayed-recognition task. The task contained separate WM processing stages (encoding, maintenance, retrieval) and different materials (object, spatial), which allowed us to investigate the influence of practice on different component processes. We observed significant monotonic decreases, and not increases, in fMRI signal primarily in unimodal and multimodal regions. These decreases occurred duringWMencoding and retrieval, but not during maintenance. Finally, regions specific to the type of memoranda (e.g., spatial or object) showed a lesser degree of sensitivity to practice as compared to regions activated by both types of memoranda, suggesting that these regions may be specialized more for carrying out processing within a particular modality than for experience-related flexibility. Overall, these findings indicate that task practice does not have a uniform effect on stages of WM processing, the type of WM memoranda being processed or on different types of brain regions. Instead, regions engaged during WM encoding and retrieval may have greater capacity for functional plasticity than WM maintenance. Additionally, the degree of specialization within brain regions may determine processing efficiency. Unimodal and multimodal regions that participate in both object and spatial processing may be specialized for flexible experiencerelated change, while those supporting primary sensorimotor processing may operate at optimal efficiency and are less susceptible to practice.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation; National Institute of Health; Dana Foundationen
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by a pre-doctoral fellowship from the National Science Foundation and grants from the National Institute of Health (NS 40813 and MH63901) and Dana Foundation.en
dc.format.extent797698 bytes
dc.format.extent78en
dc.format.extent89en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofseries1180en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBrain Researchen
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectEvent-related fMRIen
dc.subjectLearningen
dc.subjectPracticeen
dc.subjectPlasticityen
dc.titleRegional specificity and practice: Dynamic changes in object and spatial working memoryen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorNational Science Foundation
dc.contributor.sponsorNational Science Foundationen
dc.contributor.sponsorDana Foundationen
dc.contributor.sponsorNational Institutes of Health (NIH)en
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/garavanhen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid49644en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record