Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDurnin, Sheenaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-06T15:15:43Z
dc.date.available2022-05-06T15:15:43Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.date.submitted2022en
dc.identifier.citationHartshorn S, Durnin S, Lyttle MD, Barrett MJ, PERUKI., Pain management in children and young adults with minor injury in emergency departments in the UK and Ireland: a PERUKI service evaluation, BMJ Paediatr Open, 6, 1, 2022, e001273en
dc.identifier.issn2399-9772en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/98555
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.descriptionPMID: 36053599en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Management of acute pain should commence at the earliest opportunity, as it has many short-term and long-term consequences. A research priority of Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI) was to examine paediatric pain practices. Objective To describe the outcomes for paediatric pain management of minor injuries presenting to emergency departments (EDs) across PERUKI. Methods: A retrospective service evaluation was performed over a 7-day period in late 2016/early 2017 across PERUKI sites, and analysis performed using an adapted Donabedian framework. Patients under 16 years presenting with minor trauma were eligible, and data were collected on prehospital management, pain assessment, analgesia administered and injury diagnosed. Results: Thirty-one sites submitted data on 3888 patients. There were 111 missed cases (missed rate 3.6%). The most common injuries were sprains, lacerations, contusions/abrasions and fractures. Documentation of receiving analgesia before arrival in ED occurred in 21% of patients (n=818). A pain assessment was documented in 57.5% of patients (n=2235) during their ED visit, and 3.5% of patients had their pain reassessed (n=138). Of the patients who presented in severe pain (pain score 7–10 or rated severe), 11% were reassessed. Site variability of initial pain assessment ranged from 1.4% to 100% (median 62%). The characteristics of the top quartile performing centres against the bottom quartile performing centres based on completion rate of initial pain scores were identified. Conclusion: Pain assessment was documented in under 60% of children with minor injury, re-assessment of pain was almost completely absent, data and outcomes were missing in a substantial volume of patients, indicating that pain management and the associated outcomes have not been adequately addressed and prioritised within existing network structures and processes.en
dc.format.extente001273en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBMJ Paediatr Openen
dc.relation.ispartofseries6en
dc.relation.ispartofseries1en
dc.rightsYen
dc.titlePain management in children and young adults with minor injury in emergency departments in the UK and Ireland: a PERUKI service evaluationen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/sdurninen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid242744en
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001273en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDTagPAEDIATRICen
dc.subject.TCDTagPAIN RELIEFen
dc.subject.TCDTagTRAUMAen
dc.subject.TCDTagemergency medicineen
dc.subject.TCDTagpainen
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0002-5109-3417en
dc.status.accessibleNen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record