Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPavelin, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorPorter, Lynda A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-29T14:51:45Z
dc.date.available2016-07-29T14:51:45Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationPavelin, Stephen; Porter, Lynda A.. 'Race-to-the-Bottom or -Top at Home or Abroad: Health and Safety Standards and the Multinational Firm'. - Economic & Social Review, Vol. 42, No. 3, Autumn, 2011, pp289–31, Dublin: Economic & Social Research Institute
dc.identifier.issn0012-9984
dc.identifier.otherJEL XXX
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/76755
dc.description.abstractWe develop a model to illustrate potential complexities in the relationship between corporate geographical diversification and the health and safety (H&S) standards set in national jurisdictions. A firm, that initially has a plant in its home country, may choose to also have one or two foreign plants in order to improve its bargaining position versus local governments, and so ensure reduced H&S standards, i.e. a race-to-the-bottom. However, contrary to the main focus of the popular debate on this topic, we note the potential for the race-to-the-bottom tendency to be exerted on H&S standards in the multinational company’s home rather than host country, and also for an upward push on H&S to instead result.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEconomic & Social Studies
dc.sourceEconomic & Social Reviewen
dc.subjecthealth and safetyen
dc.subjectmultinational firmen
dc.titleRace-to-the-Bottom or -Top at Home or Abroad: Health and Safety Standards and the Multinational Firm
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.publisher.placeDublinen
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record