Gekker, Ruvin; Piggins, Ashley. 'Evaluating opportunities when people are uncertainty averse'. - Economic & Social Review, Vol. 40, no. 1, Spring, 2009, pp. 109–116, Dublin: Economic & Social Research Institute
We consider the problem of ranking sets of alternatives. Standard approaches to this
problem regard the addition of an alternative to a set containing one element as enhancing choice. We argue that this monotonicity axiom may not be desirable when an agent is uncertain as to the value of this additional alternative. We replace monotonicity with an uncertainty aversion axiom, and also introduce an axiom that produces lexicographic behaviour. These axioms, in conjunction with an independence axiom, enable us to prove a characterisation theorem. This theorem says that sets are ranked in terms of the number of uncertain elements that they contain, the fewer the better. This is the only ranking rule that satisfies our axioms.
Paper delivered at the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Irish Economic Association,
Westport, Co. Mayo, 25-27 April, 2008
Please note: There is a known bug in some browsers that causes an
error when a user tries to view large pdf file within the browser window.
If you receive the message "The file is damaged and could not be
repaired", please try one of the solutions linked below based on the
browser you are using.
Items in TARA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.