Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGALLAGHER, PETER THOMAS
dc.contributor.authorRAFTERY, CLAIRE LOUISE
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-05T12:22:15Z
dc.date.available2011-04-05T12:22:15Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010en
dc.identifier.citationLin, CH, Gallagher, PT, Raftery, CL, Investigating the driving mechanisms of coronal mass ejections, ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 516, A44, 2010, 9en
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/54488
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractAims. The objective of this study was to examine the kinematics of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) using EUV and coronagraph images, and to make a quantitative comparison with a number of theoretical models. One particular aim was to investigate the acceleration profile of CMEs in the low corona. Methods. We selected two CME events for this study, which occurred on 2006 December 17 (CME06) and 2007 December 31 (CME07). CME06 was observed using the EIT and LASCO instruments on-board SOHO, while CME07 was observed using the SECCHI imaging suite on STEREO. The first step of the analysis was to track the motion of each CME front and derive its velocity and acceleration. We then compared the observational kinematics, along with the information of the associated X-ray emissions from GOES and RHESSI, with the kinematics proposed by three CME models (catastrophe, breakout and toroidal instability). Results. We found that CME06 lasted over eight hours while CME07 released its energy in less than three hours. After the eruption, both CMEs were briefly slowed down before being accelerated again. The peak accelerations during the re-acceleration phase coincided with the peak soft X-ray emissions for both CMEs. Their values were 60 m s-2 for CME06 and 600 m s-2 for CME07. CME07 reached a maximum speed of over 1000 km s-1 before being slowed down to propagate away at a constant, final speed of 700 km s-1. CME06 did not reach a constant speed but was moving at a small acceleration by the end of the observation. Our comparison with the theories suggested that CME06 can be best described by a hybrid of the catastrophe model and breakout model while the characteristics of CME07 were most consistent with the breakout model. Based on the catastrophe model, we deduced that the reconnection rate in the current sheet for CME06 was intermediate, the onset of its eruption occurred at a height of 200 Mm, and the Alfven speed and the magnetic field strength at this height were approximately 130-250 km s-1 and 7 Gauss, respectively.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is supported by an ESA/PRODEX grant administered by Enterprise Ireland. C.H.L. is also supported by National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Physics Division, Taiwan.en
dc.format.extent9en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherESOen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS;
dc.relation.ispartofseries516;
dc.relation.ispartofseriesA44;
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectAstrophysicsen
dc.subjectcoronal mass ejections (CMEs)en
dc.titleInvestigating the driving mechanisms of coronal mass ejectionsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorEnterprise Irelanden
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/gallagpt
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/rafteryc
dc.identifier.rssinternalid72422
dc.identifier.rssurihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913167en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record