Melphalan 140 mg/m2or 200 mg/m2for autologous transplantation in myeloma: Results from the collaboration to collect autologous transplant outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study. A report by the EBMT chronic malignancies working party
Loading...
Files
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Access
openAccess
Embargo end date
Citation
Auner, H.W., Iacobelli, S., Sbianchi, G., Knol-Bout, C., Blaise, D., Russell, N.H., Apperley, J.F., Pohlreich, D., Browne, P.V., Kobbe, G., Isaksson, C., Lenhoff, S., Scheid, C., Touzeau, C., Jantunen, E., Anagnostopoulos, A., Yakoub-Agha, I., Tanase, A., Schaap, N., Wiktor-Jedrzejczak, W., Krejci, M., Schönland, S.O., Morris, C., Garderet, L. & Kröger, N. Melphalan 140 mg/m2or 200 mg/m2for autologous transplantation in myeloma: Results from the collaboration to collect autologous transplant outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study. A report by the EBMT chronic malignancies working party, Haematologica, 103, 3, 2018, 514-521
Abstract
Melphalan at a dose of 200 mg/m2 is standard conditioning prior
to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma, but a dose of 140 mg/m2 is often used in clinical
practice in patients perceived to be at risk of excess toxicity. To determine
whether melphalan 200 mg/m2 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 are equally
effective and tolerable in clinically relevant patient subgroups we analyzed 1964 first single autologous transplantation episodes using a series
of Cox proportional-hazards models. Overall survival, progression-free
survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality,
hematopoietic recovery and second primary malignancy rates were not
significantly different between the melphalan 140 mg/m2 (n=245) and
melphalan 200 mg/m2 (n=1719) groups. Multivariable subgroup analysis
showed that disease status at transplantation interacted with overall survival, progression-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse, with
a significant advantage associated with melphalan 200 mg/m2 in patients
transplanted in less than partial response (adjusted hazard ratios for melphalan 200 mg/m2 versus melphalan 140 mg/m2
: 0.5, 0.54, and 0.56). In
contrast, transplantation in very good partial or complete response significantly favored melphalan 140 mg/m2 for overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.02). Age, renal function, prior proteasome inhibitor treatment,
gender, or Karnofsky score did not interact with overall/progression-free
survival or relapse rate in the melphalan dose groups. There were no significant survival or relapse rate differences between melphalan 200
mg/m2 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 patients with high-risk or standard-risk
chromosomal abnormalities. In conclusion, remission status at the time
of transplantation may favor the use of melphalan 200 mg/m2 or melphalan 140 mg/m2 for key transplant outcomes (NCT01362972).
Description
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Keywords
Author's Homepage: http://people.tcd.ie/brownpv
Type of material: Journal Article

