The Lottery as a Democratic Institution

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Policy Institute

Access

OpenAccess

Embargo end date

Citation

Gil Delannoi, Oliver Dowlen, and Peter Stone, The Lottery as a Democratic Institution, The Policy Institute, July, 2013

Abstract

Proponents of random selection in politics have identified at least eight potential contributions that the practice can make to the political process. These are: descriptive representation, prevention of corruption and/or domination, mitigation of elite-level conflict, control of political outliers, distributive justice, participation, rotation, and psychological benefits. We argue that random selection makes its strongest contribution when it selects citizens to function as impartial guardians of the political system. This means selecting citizens at random, not to make policy or enact laws, but to protect the integrity of the political process?by making and enforcing legislative ethics standards, for example. Random selection?s strongest contribution is to the prevention of corruption and/or domination; the fact that it enables descriptive representation, while undeniably true, is less important to politics.

Description

PUBLISHED

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Sponsor: Trinity College Dublin (TCD)

Author's Homepage: http://people.tcd.ie/pstone

Author: Stone, Peter

Publisher: The Policy Institute
Type of material: Report