The Lottery as a Democratic Institution
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Policy Institute
Access
OpenAccess
Embargo end date
Citation
Gil Delannoi, Oliver Dowlen, and Peter Stone, The Lottery as a Democratic Institution, The Policy Institute, July, 2013
Abstract
Proponents of random selection in politics have identified at least eight potential contributions that the practice can make to the political process. These are: descriptive representation, prevention of corruption and/or domination, mitigation of elite-level conflict, control of political outliers, distributive justice, participation, rotation, and psychological benefits. We argue that random selection makes its strongest contribution when it selects citizens to function as impartial guardians of the political system. This means selecting citizens at random, not to make policy or enact laws, but to protect the integrity of the political process?by making and enforcing legislative ethics standards, for example. Random selection?s strongest contribution is to the prevention of corruption and/or domination; the fact that it enables descriptive representation, while undeniably true, is less important to politics.
Description
PUBLISHED
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Keywords
Sponsor: Trinity College Dublin (TCD)
Author's Homepage: http://people.tcd.ie/pstone
Publisher: The Policy Institute
Type of material: Report

