Conformal anomaly of (2,0) tensor multiplet in six dimensions and AdS/CFT correspondence
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Institute of Physics
Access
Embargo end date
Citation
F. Bastianelli, S. Frolov and A. A. Tseytlin, Conformal anomaly of (2,0) tensor multiplet in six dimensions and AdS/CFT correspondence, Journal of High Energy Physics, 0002, 2000, 013
Abstract
We compute the conformal anomaly in the free d = 6 superconformal (2,0) tensor
multiplet theory on generic curved background. Up to a trivial covariant totalderivative
term, it is given by the sum of the type A part proportional to the 6-d
Euler density, and the type B part containing three independent conformal invariants:
two CCC contractions of Weyl tensors and a C?2C + ... term. Multiplied by the
factor 4N3, the latter Weyl-invariant part of the anomaly reproduces exactly the corresponding
part of the conformal anomaly of large N multiple M5-brane (2,0) theory
as predicted (hep-th/9806087) by AdS7 supergravity on the basis of AdS/CFT correspondence.
The coefficients of the type A anomaly differ by the factor 4
7 ? 4N3, so
that the free tensor multiplet anomaly does not vanish on a Ricci-flat background. The
coefficient 4N3 is the same as found (hep-th/9703040) in the comparison of the tensor
multiplet theory and the d = 11 supergravity predictions for the absorption crosssections
of gravitons by M5 branes, and in the comparison (hep-th/9911135) of 2- and
3-point stress tensor correlators of the free tensor multiplet with the AdS7 supergravity
predictions. The reason for this coincidence is that the three Weyl-invariant terms in
the anomaly are related to the h2 and h3 terms in the near flat-space expansion of
the corresponding non-local effective action, and thus to the 2-point and 3-point stress
tensor correlators in flat background. At the same time, the type A anomaly is related
to the h4 term in the non-local part of the effective action, i.e. to a certain structure
in the 4-point correlation function of the stress tensors. It should thus capture some
non-trivial dynamics of the interacting theory. This is different from what happens in
the d = 4 SYM case where the type B and type A anomalies are related to the 2-point
and 3-point stress tensor correlators.
Description
PUBLISHED
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Author's Homepage: http://people.tcd.ie/frolovs
Publisher: Institute of Physics
Type of material: Journal Article

