Conformal anomaly of (2,0) tensor multiplet in six dimensions and AdS/CFT correspondence

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Institute of Physics

Access

Embargo end date

Citation

F. Bastianelli, S. Frolov and A. A. Tseytlin, Conformal anomaly of (2,0) tensor multiplet in six dimensions and AdS/CFT correspondence, Journal of High Energy Physics, 0002, 2000, 013

Abstract

We compute the conformal anomaly in the free d = 6 superconformal (2,0) tensor multiplet theory on generic curved background. Up to a trivial covariant totalderivative term, it is given by the sum of the type A part proportional to the 6-d Euler density, and the type B part containing three independent conformal invariants: two CCC contractions of Weyl tensors and a C?2C + ... term. Multiplied by the factor 4N3, the latter Weyl-invariant part of the anomaly reproduces exactly the corresponding part of the conformal anomaly of large N multiple M5-brane (2,0) theory as predicted (hep-th/9806087) by AdS7 supergravity on the basis of AdS/CFT correspondence. The coefficients of the type A anomaly differ by the factor 4 7 ? 4N3, so that the free tensor multiplet anomaly does not vanish on a Ricci-flat background. The coefficient 4N3 is the same as found (hep-th/9703040) in the comparison of the tensor multiplet theory and the d = 11 supergravity predictions for the absorption crosssections of gravitons by M5 branes, and in the comparison (hep-th/9911135) of 2- and 3-point stress tensor correlators of the free tensor multiplet with the AdS7 supergravity predictions. The reason for this coincidence is that the three Weyl-invariant terms in the anomaly are related to the h2 and h3 terms in the near flat-space expansion of the corresponding non-local effective action, and thus to the 2-point and 3-point stress tensor correlators in flat background. At the same time, the type A anomaly is related to the h4 term in the non-local part of the effective action, i.e. to a certain structure in the 4-point correlation function of the stress tensors. It should thus capture some non-trivial dynamics of the interacting theory. This is different from what happens in the d = 4 SYM case where the type B and type A anomalies are related to the 2-point and 3-point stress tensor correlators.

Description

PUBLISHED

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Author's Homepage: http://people.tcd.ie/frolovs
Publisher: Institute of Physics
Type of material: Journal Article