Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHancock, W. Neilson
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-03T18:12:09Z
dc.date.available2007-04-03T18:12:09Z
dc.date.issued1849
dc.identifier.citationHancock, W. Neilson. 'Compulsory use of native manufactures'. - Dublin: Transactions of the Dublin Statistical Society,Vol. I Session 1, 1847/1848, p1-13en
dc.identifier.issn00814776
dc.identifier.otherJEL K23
dc.identifier.otherJEL L51
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/7590
dc.descriptionRead May 15th 1848en
dc.description.abstractThe theory that a nation may gain by the compulsory use of native manufactures is directly opposed to the teachings of Adam Smith, and to those of the most distinguished economists throughout Europe. There are, however, some writers of no small reputation who have maintained this theory. Of these, two Irishmen have been frequently referred to in recent publications as authorities in its favour. The writers to whom I refer are Bishop Berkeley and Mr. Butt; and I propose, in this paper, first, to examine the general economic views which they have put forward, so as to ascertain what weight is to be attached to their authority; and, secondly, to notice some of the particular arguments adduced in support of the theory.en
dc.format.extent717954 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherStatistical and Social Inquiry Society of Irelanden
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of The Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Irelanden
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. I Session 1 1847/1848en
dc.relation.haspartVol. [No.], [Year]en
dc.source.urihttp://www.ssisi.ie
dc.subjectProtectionismen
dc.subjectNative industriesen
dc.subject.ddc314.15
dc.titleCompulsory use of native manufacturesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.status.refereedYes


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record