Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMORAN, GARYen
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-19T14:31:30Z
dc.date.available2014-11-19T14:31:30Z
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.date.submitted2015en
dc.identifier.citationJoanne Mawhinney, Eimear Connolly, Noel Claffey, Gary Moran, Ioannis Polyzois, An in vivo comparison of bacterial microleakage in two dental implant systems: identification of a pathogenic reservoir in dental implants, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 73, 3, 2015, 188 - 194en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/72051
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.descriptionPosted online on 11 Nov 2014.en
dc.description.abstractObjectives. The aim of this study was to compare internal bacterial colonization in two implant systems, one screw root form (SRF) with an external hexagon connection and one plateau root form (PRF) with a Morse taper internal connection. Materials and methods. Thirty-two implants; 12 SRF and 20 PRF, were sampled in 15 patients. All implants had been in function for at least 6 months prior to sampling. The implant restoration was removed and 10 µl of sterile saline was introduced into the implant well via a sterile glass syringe. The saline was drawn back up and transferred to the laboratory for microbiological analysis. The number of aerobic and anaerobic colony forming units per millilitre was determined and the dominant micro-organism in each sample was identified by 16s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Results. There was a significant difference between bleeding on probing around the SRF implants (3%) and the PRF implants (28%) (p = 0.0496). Bacterial colonization was identified at 11 SRF and 19 PRF implants. The numbers of anaerobic bacteria recovered from PRF implants was significantly higher than that from SRF implants (p = 0.0002). Streptococcus species and Enterococcus faecalis were found to dominate. Conclusions. This in vivo study demonstrated bacterial colonization in both types of implant systems, irrespective of the type of connection. Significantly greater anaerobic counts were found in the Morse taper internal connection implants. Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/full/10.3109/00016357.2014.978365en
dc.format.extent188en
dc.format.extent194en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Odontologica Scandinavicaen
dc.relation.ispartofseries73en
dc.relation.ispartofseries3en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectin vivoen
dc.subjectcolonization,en
dc.subjectbacteriaen
dc.subjectdental implants,en
dc.titleAn in vivo comparison of bacterial microleakage in two dental implant systems: identification of a pathogenic reservoir in dental implantsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/gmoranen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid96605en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDThemeImmunology, Inflammation & Infectionen
dc.subject.TCDTagOral clinical researchen
dc.subject.TCDTagOral microbiologyen
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0003-0469-1788en


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record