Estimation of the public benefits of urban water supply improvements in Ethiopia: a choice experiment
PEER_stage2_10.1080%2F00036846.2011.613793.pdf (PDF) 291.2Kb
Abstract Improving existing drinking water supply services in developing countries depends crucially on available financial resources. Cost recovery rates of these services are typically low, while demand for more reliable services is high and rapidly growing. Most stated preference based demand studies in the developing world apply the contingent valuation method and focus on rural areas. This study examines household willingness to pay for improved water supply services in a choice experiment in an urban area in Ethiopia, a country with the lowest water supply coverage in Sub-Saharan Africa. The design of the choice experiment allows estimation of the value of both drinking water supply reliability and safety. The estimated economic values can be used in policy appraisals of improved supply investment decisions. Despite significant income constraints, households are willing to pay up to 80 percent extra for improved levels of water supply over and above their current water bill. Women and households living in the poorest part of the city with the lowest service levels value the improvement of water quality most. As expected, also averting behavior and expenditures play an important role.
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
Affiliation:Hawassa University, Economics - Hawassa - ETHIOPIA (Tarfasa, Solomon)
Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - De Boelelaan 1087--> - 1081 HV - Amsterdam - NETHERLANDS (Brouwer, Roy)
NETHERLANDS (Brouwer, Roy)