Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSMITH, VALERIEen
dc.contributor.authorBEGLEY, CECILYen
dc.contributor.authorCLARKE, MICHAELen
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-22T17:55:25Z
dc.date.available2011-02-22T17:55:25Z
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.date.submitted2011en
dc.identifier.citationSmith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M, Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions., BMC medical research methodology, 11, 1, 2011, 15en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2288en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/50751
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hundreds of studies of maternity care interventions have been published, too many for most people involved in providing maternity care to identify and consider when making decisions. It became apparent that systematic reviews of individual studies were required to appraise, summarise and bring together existing studies in a single place. However, decision makers are increasingly faced by a plethora of such reviews and these are likely to be of variable quality and scope, with more than one review of important topics. Systematic reviews (or overviews) of reviews are a logical and appropriate next step, allowing the findings of separate reviews to be compared and contrasted, providing clinical decision makers with the evidence they need. Methods: The methods used to identify and appraise published and unpublished reviews systematically, drawing on our experiences and good practice in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews are described. The process of identifying and appraising all published reviews allows researchers to describe the quality of this evidence base, summarise and compare the review?s conclusions and discuss the strength of these conclusions. Results: Methodological challenges and possible solutions are described within the context of (i) sources, (ii) study selection, (iii) quality assessment (i.e. the extent of searching undertaken for the reviews, description of study selection and inclusion criteria, comparability of included studies, assessment of publication bias and assessment of heterogeneity), (iv) presentation of results, and (v) implications for practice and research. Conclusion: Conducting a systematic review of reviews highlights the usefulness of bringing together a summary of reviews in one place, where there is more than one review on an important topic. The methods described here should help clinicians to review and appraise published reviews systematically, and aid evidence-based clinical decision-making.en
dc.format.extent15en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBMC medical research methodologyen
dc.relation.ispartofseries11en
dc.relation.ispartofseries1en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectHealthcareen
dc.subjectMaternity care interventionsen
dc.titleMethodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/vsmithen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/smithv1en
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/cbegleyen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/clarkem2en
dc.identifier.rssinternalid71257en
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-15en
dc.identifier.rssurihttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/15en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record