Business Performance evaluation Universities Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)
Issue Date:
2012
Citation:
Hung-Yi Wu; Jui-Kuei Chen; I-Shuo Chen; Hsin-Hui Zhuo, Ranking Universities Based on Performance Evaluation by a Hybrid MCDM Model, Measurement, 2012
Series/Report no.:
Measurement;
Abstract:
The aims of this study are to weight the performance evaluation indices for higher education based on the official performance evaluation structure developed by the Taiwan Assessment and Evaluation Association (TWAEA) and to rank 12 private universities listed by the Ministry of Education as a case study. We apply a hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to accomplish these objectives. Specifically, we utilize the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to accomplish the first aim, but we adopt the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method for the second aim by utilizing the AHP outcome. We also compare the official rankings of the 12 private universities with our ranking of the same universities. Our study endeavors to help universities optimize their performances with efficiency. In addition, the results of this study could provide a reference point for other universities and related educational institutions in their efforts to conduct evaluations, improve their performances and form educational policies.
Please note: There is a known bug in some browsers that causes an
error when a user tries to view large pdf file within the browser window.
If you receive the message "The file is damaged and could not be
repaired", please try one of the solutions linked below based on the
browser you are using.
Items in TARA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.