The University of Dublin | Trinity College -- Ollscoil Átha Cliath | Coláiste na Tríonóide
Trinity's Access to Research Archive
Home :: Log In :: Submit :: Alerts ::

TARA >
School of Medicine >
Psychiatry >
Psychiatry (Scholarly Publications) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2262/55416

Title: The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study.
Author: KENNEDY, HARRY
O'NEILL, CONOR
Author's Homepage: http://people.tcd.ie/kennedh
http://people.tcd.ie/coneill1
Keywords: Psychiatry
therapeutic security
DUNDRUM-1
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: BIOMED CENTRAL
Citation: Flynn G, O'Neill C, McInerney C, Kennedy HG, The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study., BMC Psychiatry, 11, 2011, 43
Series/Report no.: BMC Psychiatry;
11;
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The assessment of those presenting to prison in-reach and court diversion services and those referred for admission to mental health services is a triage decision, allocating the patient to the appropriate level of therapeutic security. This is a critical clinical decision. We set out to improve on unstructured clinical judgement. We collated qualitative information and devised an 11 item structured professional judgment instrument for this purpose then tested for validity. METHODS: All those assessed following screening over a three month period at a busy remand committals prison (n = 246) were rated in a retrospective cohort design blind to outcome. Similarly, all those admitted to a mental health service from the same prison in-reach service over an overlapping two year period were rated blind to outcome (n = 100). RESULTS: The 11 item scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and inter-rater reliability. The scale score did not correlate with the HCR-20 'historical' score. For the three month sample, the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) for those admitted to hospital was 0.893 (95% confidence interval 0.843 to 0.943). For the two year sample, AUC distinguished at each level between those admitted to open wards, low secure units or a medium/high secure service. Open wards v low secure units AUC = 0.805 (95% CI 0.680 to 0.930); low secure v medium/high secure AUC = 0.866, (95% CI 0.784 to 0.949). Item to outcome correlations were significant for all 11 items. CONCLUSIONS: The DUNDRUM-1 triage security scale and its items performed to criterion levels when tested against the real world outcome. This instrument can be used to ensure consistency in decision making when deciding who to admit to secure forensic hospitals. It can also be used to benchmark admission thresholds between services and jurisdictions. In this study we found some divergence between assessed need and actual placement. This provides fertile ground for future research as well as practical assistance in assessing unmet need, auditing case mix and planning care pathways.
Description: PUBLISHED
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2262/55416
Related links: http://dx.crossref.org/10.1186%2F1471-244X-11-43
Appears in Collections:Psychiatry (Scholarly Publications)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security- retrospective-cohort validation study.pdfPublished (publisher's copy) - Peer Reviewed303.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright


Please note: There is a known bug in some browsers that causes an error when a user tries to view large pdf file within the browser window. If you receive the message "The file is damaged and could not be repaired", please try one of the solutions linked below based on the browser you are using.

Items in TARA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback