The University of Dublin | Trinity College -- Ollscoil Átha Cliath | Coláiste na Tríonóide
Trinity's Access to Research Archive
Home :: Log In :: Submit :: Alerts ::

School of Engineering >
Mechanical & Manufacturing Eng >
Mechanical & Manufacturing Eng (Scholarly Publications) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Pedestrian Risk from Cars and Sport Utility Vehicles - A Comparative Analytical Study
Author's Homepage:
Keywords: Public and environmental health
sport utility vehicles (SUVs)
Issue Date: 2006
Publisher: Sage
Citation: Simms CK and Wood DP, Pedestrian Risk from Cars and Sport Utility Vehicles - A Comparative Analytical Study, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 220, 8, 2006, 1085 1100
Series/Report no.: 220;
Abstract: Analysis of real-world crash data from the USA shows that 11.5 per cent of pedestrians struck by large sport utility vehicles (SUVs) are killed, compared with 4.5 per cent of pedestrians struck by passenger cars. The design of the vehicle front-end structure has a substantial influence on injury outcome when pedestrians are struck by vehicles. In the context of the rising population of SUVs, it is important to determine the causes of their increased hazard to pedestrians. In this paper, validated multi-body models are used to show that the shape of SUVs results in higher pedestrian injuries to the mid-body regions compared to passenger cars. Analysis shows that the mass difference between cars and SUVs is not significant for pedestrian injury causation and it is shown that an important effect of the higher front profile of SUVs is that the pedestrian is struck more centrally with respect to the body’s centre of gravity, increasing the momentum transfer in the primary impact. A further important effect of the higher bonnet leading edge is that there is a direct impact to the mid-body region, which explains the significant abdomen and other internal injuries reported from real-world SUV/pedestrian impacts. By comparison, head injuries sustained from primary vehicle contact are shown to be similar or slightly lower for SUV/pedestrian impacts compared to car/ pedestrian impacts. However, real-world evidence and the current models suggest that the secondary impact with the ground is more severe in SUV/pedestrian impacts compared to car/ pedestrian impacts. Overall, these results show that the empirical finding that SUVs are more hazardous for pedestrians than passenger cars is primarily a function of the high bumper and bonnet for such vehicles.
Description: PUBLISHED
Related links:
Appears in Collections:Mechanical & Manufacturing Eng (Scholarly Publications)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Pedestrian risk from cars.pdfPublished (publisher's copy) - Peer Reviewed5.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Please note: There is a known bug in some browsers that causes an error when a user tries to view large pdf file within the browser window. If you receive the message "The file is damaged and could not be repaired", please try one of the solutions linked below based on the browser you are using.

Items in TARA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback