The University of Dublin | Trinity College -- Ollscoil Átha Cliath | Coláiste na Tríonóide
Trinity's Access to Research Archive
Home :: Log In :: Submit :: Alerts ::

School of Medicine >
Public Health & Primary Care >
Public Health & Primary Care (Scholarly Publications) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study
Author's Homepage:
Keywords: smoking
bar workers
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Citation: Allwright Shane, Paul Gillian, Greiner Birgit, Mullally Bernie J et al., Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study, Brirtish Medical Journal, 331, 7525, 2005, 1117 - 1120
Series/Report no.: Brirtish Medical Journal;
Abstract: Objectives: To compare exposure to secondhand smoke and respiratory health in bar staff in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland before and after the introduction of legislation for smoke-free workplaces in the Republic. Design: Comparisons before and after the legislation in intervention and control regions. Setting: Public houses in three areas in the Republic (intervention) and one area in Northern Ireland (control). Participants: 329 bar staff enrolled in baseline survey; 249 (76%) followed up one year later. Of these, 158 were non-smokers both at baseline and follow-up. Main outcome measures: Salivary cotinine concentration, self reported exposure to secondhand smoke, and respiratory and sensory irritation symptoms. Results: In bar staff in the Republic who did not themselves smoke, salivary cotinine concentrations dropped by 80% after the smoke-free law (from median 29.0 nmol/l (95% confidence interval 18.2 to 43.2 nmol/l)) to 5.1 nmol/l (2.8 to 13.1 nmol/l) in contrast with a 20% decline in Northern Ireland over the same period (from median 25.3 nmol/l (10.4 to 59.2 nmol/l) to 20.4 nmol/l (13.2 to 33.8 nmol/l)). Changes in self reported exposure to secondhand smoke were consistent with the changes in cotinine concentrations. Reporting any respiratory symptom declined significantly in the Republic (down 16.7%, -26.1% to -7.3%) but not in Northern Ireland (0% difference, -32.7% to 32.7%). After adjustment for confounding, respiratory symptoms declined significantly more in the Republic than in Northern Ireland and the decline in cotinine concentration was twice as great. Conclusion: The smoke-free law in the Republic of Ireland protects non-smoking bar workers from exposure to secondhand smoke.
Description: PUBLISHED
Related links:
Appears in Collections:Public Health & Primary Care (Scholarly Publications)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland - before and after study.pdfPublished (publisher's copy) - Peer Reviewed103.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Please note: There is a known bug in some browsers that causes an error when a user tries to view large pdf file within the browser window. If you receive the message "The file is damaged and could not be repaired", please try one of the solutions linked below based on the browser you are using.

Items in TARA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback