The University of Dublin | Trinity College -- Ollscoil Átha Cliath | Coláiste na Tríonóide
Trinity's Access to Research Archive
Home :: Log In :: Submit :: Alerts ::

School of Computer Science and Statistics >
Computer Science >
Computer Science Technical Reports >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Constraints on Analogical Mapping: A Comparison of Three Models
Author: Keane, Mark T.
Keywords: Computer Science
Issue Date: Oct-1993
Publisher: Trinity College Dublin, Department of Computer Science
Citation: Keane, Mark T.. 'Constraints on Analogical Mapping: A Comparison of Three Models'. - Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Computer Science, TCD-CS-93-24, 1993, pp89
Series/Report no.: Computer Science Technical Report
Abstract: Three theories of analogy have been proposed which are supported by computational models and data from experiments on human analogical abilities. In this paper, we show how these theories can be unified within a common metatheoretical framework which distinguishes between levels of informational, behavioural and hardware constraints. This framework makes clear the distinctions between three computational models in the literature (the Analogical Constraint Mapping Engine, the Structure-Mapping Engine and the Incremental Analogy Machine) . The paper then goes on to develop a methodology for the comparative testing of these models. In two different manipulations of an analogical-mapping task we compare the results of computational experiments with these models against the results of psychological experiments. In the first experiment, we show that increasing the number of similar elements in two analogical domains, decreases the response time taken to reach the correct mapping for an analogy problem. In the second psychological experiment we find that the order in which the elements of the two domains are presented has significant facilitative effects on the ease of analogical mapping. Only one of the three models, that model which embodies behavioural constraints, the Incremental Analogy Machine, predicts both of these results. Finally, the immediate implications of these results for analogy research are discussed, along with the wider implications the research has for cognitive science methodology.
Description: Substantial revision of TCD-CS-92-08; Also to appear in Cognitive Science
Appears in Collections:Computer Science Technical Reports

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
TCD-CS-93-24.pdf239.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Please note: There is a known bug in some browsers that causes an error when a user tries to view large pdf file within the browser window. If you receive the message "The file is damaged and could not be repaired", please try one of the solutions linked below based on the browser you are using.

Items in TARA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback