Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBradley, John
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-24T11:28:32Z
dc.date.available2012-07-24T11:28:32Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationBradley, John. 'The ratio of unemployment rates and fair employment: a response to Richard Breen'. - Economic & Social Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, January, 1998, pp. 95-97. Dublin: Economic & Social Research Institute
dc.identifier.issn0012-9984
dc.identifier.otherJEL J31
dc.identifier.otherJEL J64
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/64427
dc.description.abstractIn my original critique of the G&B study I addressed three issues. First, the political context within which that study was commissioned, issued and debated. Second, the fact that such a crucial analysis of a highly divisive issue in Northern Ireland was based almost solely on a technical mathematical model that was poorly described and that contained potentially serious misspecifications and errors. Third, the possible reasons why the debate on G&B has generated more heat than light.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEconomic & Social Studies
dc.sourceEconomic & Social Reviewen
dc.subjectUnemployment ratesen
dc.subjectFair employmenten
dc.subjectIrelanden
dc.titleThe ratio of unemployment rates and fair employment: a response to Richard Breen
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.publisher.placeDublinen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record