Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFLEMING, GARRYen
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-29T15:15:10Z
dc.date.available2012-02-29T15:15:10Z
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.date.submitted2012en
dc.identifier.citationDowling AH, Fleming GJP, McGinley EL, Addison O, Improving the standard of the standard for glass ionomers: an alternative to the compressive fracture strength test for consideration?, Journal of Dentistry, 40, 3, 2012, 189 - 201en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/62423
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Three strength tests (compressive, three point flexure and biaxial) were performed on three glass ionomer (GI) restoratives to assess the most appropriate methodology in terms of validity and reliability. The influence of mixing induced variability on the data sets generated were eliminated by using encapsulated GIs Methods: Specimen groups of 40 (eight batches of n = 5) cylinders (6.0 ? 0.1 mm height, 4.0 ?0.1 mm diameter) for compressive testing, bars (25.0 ? 0.1 mm length, 2.0 ? 0.1 mm height, 2.0 ? 0.1 mm width) for three point flexure testing and discs (13.0 ? 0.1 mm diameter, 1.0 ? 0.1 mm thickness) for biaxial testing were randomly prepared by an operator. The strength data sets for each GI restorative were pooled and one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted to compare between GI restoratives (p = 0.05). The coefficient of variation (CoV) values for each test were pooled and a one-way ANOVA was conducted to test for differences between the reliability of the three tests Results: For the GI restoratives, the one-way ANOVA showed significant differences when tested in compression (p = 0.001) but not when tested in three point (p = 0.271) or biaxial (p = 0.134) flexure. The pooled CoV values showed no significant difference between the three strength tests (p = 0.632). Conclusions: The compressive fracture strength test specified for GIs in the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO 9917-1: 2003) should be replaced and should no longer be advocated for the predictive performance modelling of GI restorativesen
dc.format.extent189en
dc.format.extent201en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Dentistryen
dc.relation.ispartofseries40en
dc.relation.ispartofseries3en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectDentistryen
dc.subjectglass ionomer restorativeen
dc.titleImproving the standard of the standard for glass ionomers: an alternative to the compressive fracture strength test for consideration?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/fleminggen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid76259en
dc.identifier.rssurihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.002en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record