<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2798</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T09:51:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Symposium on traffic congestion in Dublin: policy options</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2918</link>
      <description>Title: Symposium on traffic congestion in Dublin: policy options
Author: Keegan, Owen
Abstract: This paper presents background information on traffic and the transportation needs&#xD;
of Dublin, reviews the positive developments in transportation policy in Dublin in recent&#xD;
years, and offers reflections on the Platform for Change transportation strategy and the policy&#xD;
options most appropriate for Dublin, in particular; completing infrastructure projects&#xD;
currently under construction, developing the bus system and suburban rail/DART system, and&#xD;
exploiting demand management measures including pricing.
Description: Read before the Society, 1 April 2003</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2918</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competitiveness implications for Ireland of EU enlargement</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2620</link>
      <description>Title: Competitiveness implications for Ireland of EU enlargement
Author: Barry, Frank; Hannon, Aoife; Hudson, Elaine; KEARNEY, COLM
Abstract: Subject to ratification, a further ten states, primarily from Central and&#xD;
Eastern Europe will accede to the EU in May 2004. Another two, and possibly three,&#xD;
CEE states are likely to join in 2007. The present paper assesses the competitiveness&#xD;
implications of this phase of EU expansion for Ireland. Four specific topics are&#xD;
considered: the opportunities for trade and investment expansion, the implications&#xD;
for Ireland’s ability to attract FDI, the likely levels and consequences of immigration&#xD;
from Central and Eastern Europe, and the budgetary implications for the Irish&#xD;
Exchequer.
Description: Read before the Society, 6 February 2003</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2620</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Redistributive forces of the Irish tax-benefit system</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2619</link>
      <description>Title: Redistributive forces of the Irish tax-benefit system
Author: O'Donoghue, Cathal
Abstract: This paper charts the main changes in structure of the Irish system of tax&#xD;
and social benefits over the period 1955-2002. It analyses the evolution of the&#xD;
redistributive forces in the system over the period and considers the effect of the&#xD;
incremental reform on the complexity of policy and resulting impact on incentives.
Description: Read before the Society, 28 November 2002</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2619</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sources of regional divergence in the Celtic Tiger: policy responses</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2618</link>
      <description>Title: Sources of regional divergence in the Celtic Tiger: policy responses
Author: O'Leary, Eoin
Abstract: This paper presents new evidence on the sources of living standards&#xD;
divergence among Irish regional authority areas during the “Celtic Tiger” boom&#xD;
period of the 1990s, which has been associated with unbalanced regional&#xD;
development. The paper shows that strong regional living standards divergence&#xD;
during this period was driven both by the emergence of the “demographic dividend”&#xD;
and by productivity. Productivity divergence was, in turn, driven by the&#xD;
manufacturing sector. Although structural change had a convergent effect on&#xD;
productivity in previous decades, this effect was negligible during the “Celtic Tiger”&#xD;
boom. The discussion then considers the appropriate response to Ireland’s regional&#xD;
policy dilemma, namely how to address the problem of regional imbalance without&#xD;
compromising national growth and competitiveness. At the beginning of the new&#xD;
millennium, regional policy is back on the agenda with the inclusion of balanced&#xD;
regional development as a key objective in the National Development Plan: 2000-&#xD;
06. However, delays in the formulation of the National Spatial Strategy gives rise to&#xD;
concern. Based on the results of the paper, it is argued that future growth in regional&#xD;
and therefore national living standards hinges on continued productivity growth in&#xD;
internationally competitive industries based in Irish regions, as demographic factors&#xD;
and structural change are unlikely to continue playing prominent roles. It&#xD;
recommends that policy be targeted at improving regional growth and&#xD;
competitiveness in regional authority areas, rather than aiming for balanced regional&#xD;
development.
Description: Read before the Society, 7 November 2002</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2618</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is equating market share to market power a sound economic principle?</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2598</link>
      <description>Title: Is equating market share to market power a sound economic principle?
Author: Whelan, Ciara
Abstract: There is a long history of mapping market structure into market power in&#xD;
economic analysis. This paper addresses the validity of this principle for both&#xD;
homogenous and differentiated products industries. While mapping market share&#xD;
dominance into market power may be acceptable for homogenous goods as a rule of&#xD;
thumb, it is by no means a robust result. In the case of differentiated products&#xD;
industries, there is no theoretical foundation for such a mapping. This paper&#xD;
highlights the need to move towards a structural approach to assessing market power&#xD;
in industries.
Description: Read before the Society, 8 May 2003. &#xD;
This lecture is delivered under the auspices of the Barrington Trust (founded by&#xD;
the bequest of John Barrington, Esq.) with the collaboration of the Journal of the&#xD;
Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2598</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

