<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection: Law School (Theses and Dissertations)</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/103</link>
    <description>Law School (Theses and Dissertations)</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:11:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-20T05:11:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The Evidence of Child Witnesses - Where Rules of Evidence and the Constitution Collide</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/40110</link>
      <description>Title: The Evidence of Child Witnesses - Where Rules of Evidence and the Constitution Collide
Author: Casey, Rachel
Abstract: This thesis explores the development and reform of particular aspects of the law of evidence&#xD;
relating to child witnesses as informed by the changing orthodoxy advanced by psychologists&#xD;
-  and adopted by the law - regarding, in particular, the capabilities and reliability of children&#xD;
as witnesses. Three principal areas of the law of evidence relating to children are scrutinised,&#xD;
namely: (i) the competence of children as witnesses; (ii) the corroboration requirements&#xD;
attaching to the evidence of children; and (iii) the examination of child witnesses and the&#xD;
statutory ’special measures’ designed to facilitate the reception of evidence from such&#xD;
witnesses.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2262/40110</guid>
      <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

