<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/62030">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/62030</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/60167" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/59021" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/58936" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/58930" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/58927" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-05-12T21:16:12Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/60167">
    <title>Employment and life-satisfaction: insights from Ireland</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/60167</link>
    <description>Title: Employment and life-satisfaction: insights from Ireland
Author: Brereton, Finbarr; Clinch, J. Peter; Ferreira, Susana
Abstract: Mainstream neoclassical economics takes it as given that the consumption of goods and&#xD;
services (output) is positively related to well-being. Work (labour-input) is assumed to be negatively related to well-being at the margin and so is only undertaken in exchange for payment. This view has been challenged for decades in the psychology and sociology literature and results suggests that employment status (especially unemployment) has profound effects on well-being, even at the margin. It is surprising then that several labour force status categories have been under researched in the literature to date. In this paper, using a sample of Irish adults carried out in 2001, we extend the current literature to examine the impacts of additional labour force status categories on life-satisfaction based on International Labour Organisation (ILO) classifications. These include part-time employment, disconnection from the labour force and being disabled, unable to work. Additionally, we expand the analysis of unemployment in the happiness literature and examine if the effects of unemployment and part-time employment on life satisfaction are conditioned by gender. Insights show that being part-time employed has a significant negative effect on life satisfaction, particularly for males. Being unemployed is found to have a significant negative effect on well-being, independent of gender and income, but no such effect is found for the local unemployment rate.</description>
    <dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/59021">
    <title>How reliable is the Quarterly National Household Survey for migration research?</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/59021</link>
    <description>Title: How reliable is the Quarterly National Household Survey for migration research?
Author: Barrett, Alan; Kelly, Elish
Abstract: Much research has been conducted on immigration into Ireland in recent years using data from the Quarterly National Household Survey (QNHS), the official source for labour market data in Ireland. As it is known that the QNHS undercounts immigrants, a concern exists over whether the profile of immigrants being provided is accurate. For example, QNHS-based research has shown that immigrants in Ireland are a highly-educated group. However, if it is the case that those who are missed by the QNHS are more heavily drawn from among low-skilled immigrants, then the profile being reported and used in other research may be inaccurate. In this paper, we use the Irish Census of 2006 to assess the reliability of the profile of immigrants provided by the QNHS by comparing the characteristics of immigrants in both datasets. In general, we find that the QNHS does indeed provide a reliable picture and that earlier findings on the education levels of immigrants in Ireland hold.</description>
    <dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/58936">
    <title>Book review:  Interrogating Irish policies / by William Kingston.  Dublin: Dublin University Press, 2007.</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/58936</link>
    <description>Title: Book review:  Interrogating Irish policies / by William Kingston.  Dublin: Dublin University Press, 2007.
Author: Barry, Frank; Kingston, William
Description: Book review</description>
    <dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/58930">
    <title>Job turnover in Irish manufacturing 1972–2006</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/58930</link>
    <description>Title: Job turnover in Irish manufacturing 1972–2006
Author: Lawless, Martina; Murphy, Alan P.
Abstract: With the recent slowdown in global economic growth, there has been considerable focus&#xD;
in Ireland on some high-profile job losses, particularly in the manufacturing sector. This paper places such developments into a broader context and shows that aggregate changes in the net number of jobs arise from large numbers of firms both increasing and decreasing employment simultaneously at all points in time. Even at the height of the Celtic Tiger boom when employment grew by 8 per cent, this was the result of 15 per cent growth in jobs by expanding firms offset by 7 per cent of positions being eliminated in contracting firms. One important feature of job flows is that they may contribute to productivity growth by allowing movements from low to high productivity firms. To a degree, this reflects the re-allocation of jobs from declining sectors to expanding sectors, but this is not a comprehensive explanation. A significant factor underlying job flows is the reallocation within sectors from under-performing firms to expanding firms. This study also shows that productivity growth is, on balance, positive for employment growth. On the other hand, these calculations also show how hard it is for policymakers to identify firms that will be employment and productivity growth winners.</description>
    <dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/58927">
    <title>Making globalisation work</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/58927</link>
    <description>Title: Making globalisation work
Author: Stiglitz, Joseph E.
Abstract: My topic for this Geary lecture is ‘Making Globalisation Work. A question I am often asked is – how did I come to write my book entitled Making Globalisation Work? It was said: “You have complained enough. What would you do about it?” This was an important challenge, and in fact as I thought about it, there are a wealth of changes that could be proposed: some small, some large, some that one could do almost overnight, and some that would take years, perhaps decades, to bring about. However, thinking through systematically about the kinds of changes one could bring about to make globalisation work, or at least work better than it has been working, seemed to me something that was really very important. So what I did in this book, and what I will try to do in this lecture, is first to list what has gone wrong and which grievances, amongst all those that have been raised, are the most legitimate. Second, I will analyse how things have been changing and explore whether they have been getting better or worse. Third, I will make a diagnosis of why globalisation has not been living up to its potential and why it is failing in each of the several areas that I am going to talk about. Finally, based on that diagnosis, I will discuss what can be done to&#xD;
at least ameliorate some of the problem situations.
Description: The 2006 Geary Lecture</description>
    <dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

