<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/103">
    <title>DSpace Collection: Law School (Theses and Dissertations)</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/103</link>
    <description>Law School (Theses and Dissertations)</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/40110" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T16:41:02Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/40110">
    <title>The Evidence of Child Witnesses - Where Rules of Evidence and the Constitution Collide</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/40110</link>
    <description>Title: The Evidence of Child Witnesses - Where Rules of Evidence and the Constitution Collide
Author: Casey, Rachel
Abstract: This thesis explores the development and reform of particular aspects of the law of evidence&#xD;
relating to child witnesses as informed by the changing orthodoxy advanced by psychologists&#xD;
-  and adopted by the law - regarding, in particular, the capabilities and reliability of children&#xD;
as witnesses. Three principal areas of the law of evidence relating to children are scrutinised,&#xD;
namely: (i) the competence of children as witnesses; (ii) the corroboration requirements&#xD;
attaching to the evidence of children; and (iii) the examination of child witnesses and the&#xD;
statutory ’special measures’ designed to facilitate the reception of evidence from such&#xD;
witnesses.</description>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

