<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2821" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2821</id>
  <updated>2013-05-22T09:55:44Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-22T09:55:44Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>On the use of structural funds</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2958" />
    <author>
      <name>McCarthy, Thomas G.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2958</id>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:55:32Z</updated>
    <published>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: On the use of structural funds
Author: McCarthy, Thomas G.
Abstract: Recent efforts to secure EC funding by Irish governments, and in particular Irish officials,&#xD;
have been a resounding success. A priori one might expect that the richest country would be&#xD;
the largest net contributor in GDP share terms and the poorest country the largest net&#xD;
recipient. Our a priori expectation is not fulfilled. &#xD;
However, these are not such as to alter the main message. Ireland does very well from the&#xD;
EC in financial terms.&#xD;
This is no surprise and it serves merely to confirm the perception that we are experts in&#xD;
the art of "grantmanship". But will this success translate itself into a permanent&#xD;
improvement in our welfare? Are there any principles that can guide the spending of this&#xD;
money so as to best achieve this end? These are questions for tonight's symposium. This&#xD;
contribution will consider the impact that public expenditure can have on economic growth.&#xD;
In particular we survey some recent evidence on this issue. We conclude with some&#xD;
tentative lessons which may provide a basis for our discussion.
Description: Read before the society, 4 March 1993</summary>
    <dc:date>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Background and some issues</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2919" />
    <author>
      <name>Durkan, Joe</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2919</id>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:55:32Z</updated>
    <published>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Background and some issues
Author: Durkan, Joe
Abstract: The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF), and&#xD;
the guidance element of the European Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) associated&#xD;
with the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) constitute the Structural Funds of the European&#xD;
Community.&#xD;
Each of these Funds was begun separately and was designed to meet particular needs. For&#xD;
example, the Regional Fund was originally designed to mitigate the effect on regions of the&#xD;
Community of existing inequalities by region, adverse effects resulting from the operation&#xD;
of the Rome Treaty, and a natural tendency to centralisation and the effects this has on the&#xD;
periphery, while the Guidance section of the European Guidance and Guarantee Fund was&#xD;
focused on structural improvement in farming.&#xD;
The Act establishing the Single Market (the Single European Act) required that these funds&#xD;
be reorganised to become more effective. The 1988 Community budget settlement agreed&#xD;
that the ERDF and the ESF should increase, with the level of spending in 1993 double that&#xD;
of 1987, and with a concentration of spending in poorer regions. This was taken further in&#xD;
1989 when Heads of State and Government, taking not only the ERDF and ESF but the&#xD;
EAGGF (Guidance Section) and the European Investment Bank (EIB), established the&#xD;
Community Support Framework (CSF) - namely the set of reorganised Structural Funds,&#xD;
designed, as the name implies, to support development in areas whose own resources were&#xD;
inadequate to reduce inequalities between regions within the EC.&#xD;
The issue of inequalities between regions and countries within the EC has been the subject&#xD;
of much theoretical debate - Krugman's annexe in the Padoa-Schioppa report remains the&#xD;
clearest statement of the issues. There has been much less discussion of the numbers and&#xD;
what lies behind them.
Description: Read before the Society, 4 March, 1993</summary>
    <dc:date>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Irish industrial structure, 1979-1985: a longitudinal analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2880" />
    <author>
      <name>Keating, W.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Keane, T.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2880</id>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:55:28Z</updated>
    <published>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Irish industrial structure, 1979-1985: a longitudinal analysis
Author: Keating, W.; Keane, T.
Abstract: The manufacturing sector of the economy is vital in that it is the engine of&#xD;
economic growth. Despite developments in other areas of the economy, it still&#xD;
carries much of the potential for job creation, either directly or indirectly, in the&#xD;
years ahead. For this reason and also because of the considerable level of state&#xD;
expenditure on industrial development, good statistics on the performance of&#xD;
this sector are essential in order to have a full understanding of the factors&#xD;
underlying changes in output and employment, in particular. Developments in&#xD;
Irish manufacturing industry in the 1980's have been the subject of much&#xD;
debate. This has centered to a considerable extent on the rapid increase in&#xD;
productivity which has been a function of output growth, quite substantial in&#xD;
comparison to that of our European partners, and declining employment. The&#xD;
authors hope that this paper can be a contribution to this debate by looking at&#xD;
some of the structural changes which have taken place in the last decade and&#xD;
identifying at least some of the factors which have influenced these changes.
Description: Read before the Society, 18 May, 1989</summary>
    <dc:date>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On producers and users of statistics</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2879" />
    <author>
      <name>Sexton, J. J.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2879</id>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:55:28Z</updated>
    <published>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: On producers and users of statistics
Author: Sexton, J. J.
Abstract: It is always somewhat difficult for presidents of societies like The Statistical and&#xD;
Social Inquiry Society to decide on an appropriate topic for a presidential&#xD;
address. It is not normally an occasion for an in-depth assessment of any&#xD;
particular issue but frequently takes the form of a "state of the art" expose&#xD;
relating to some areas of current interest. Some suggestions as to future&#xD;
directions to be followed may also be indicated. Broadly speaking I propose to&#xD;
follow (or attempt to follow) this course in relation to my chosen topic. The main&#xD;
reason why I have selected this particular issue derives from the fact that I have&#xD;
some experience as both a producer and a user of statistics. I spent some&#xD;
eighteen years in the CSO and for more than eight years now I have been&#xD;
engaged in research of a socio-economic nature. I felt that there might be&#xD;
some benefit therefore in expressing my views from both points of view. I might&#xD;
add of course that throughout this paper, even though it is not always said, my&#xD;
comments relate only to Government statistics.
Description: Read before the Society, 27 April, 1989</summary>
    <dc:date>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CRH pic investment strategy - an overview</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2878" />
    <author>
      <name>Hayes, J.J.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2878</id>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:55:28Z</updated>
    <published>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: CRH pic investment strategy - an overview
Author: Hayes, J.J.
Abstract: Your President invited me to speak on CRH's investment strategy, with particular&#xD;
emphases on external acquisitions and equity participations, domestic&#xD;
diversification and export operations. I am happy to share with you the&#xD;
evolvement of our strategy.&#xD;
CRH resulted from a merger between Irish Cement and Roadstone in 1970. Post&#xD;
the merger there have been three phases in its development strategy.
Description: Read before the Society, 2 March, 1989</summary>
    <dc:date>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Borrow and prosper - notes on the user cost of capital</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2862" />
    <author>
      <name>Frain, John</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2862</id>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:55:28Z</updated>
    <published>1990-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Borrow and prosper - notes on the user cost of capital
Author: Frain, John
Abstract: It is often argued that many firms can do very well by borrowing. The&#xD;
conclusion is based on two points which may be illustrated as follows.&#xD;
Firstly suppose that the effective rate of income tax is 50%, the nominal&#xD;
interest rate 8% and inflation 3%. Then the effective interest rate after&#xD;
deducting tax allowances on interest paid is 4% which is equivalent to&#xD;
a real interest rate of 1%. Now suppose that the nominal interest rate&#xD;
increases to 12% and inflation to 7%, then tax allowances reduce the&#xD;
effective interest rate to 6% and the real interest rate becomes negative.&#xD;
Variations on this theme are many.
Description: Read before the Society 31 May 1990</summary>
    <dc:date>1990-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Money and banking in Ireland - origins development and future</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2861" />
    <author>
      <name>McGowan, Padraig</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2861</id>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:55:32Z</updated>
    <published>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Money and banking in Ireland - origins development and future
Author: McGowan, Padraig
Abstract: Currency and banking have a relatively long tradition in Ireland. Coins have&#xD;
circulated for about 1,000 years and banking has been practised for some 300&#xD;
years. Significant financial change was a feature of earlier periods as it has been&#xD;
over the past twenty five years. Current indications are that the rate of structural&#xD;
change in the financial sector will gain momentum between now and the end of&#xD;
this century. An appreciation of the past can contribute to understanding the&#xD;
present. Influence over future events can be improved by a greater awareness&#xD;
of how we adapted to change in the past. With this in mind, a brief review of the&#xD;
evolution of currency and banking in Ireland, both in the Republic and Northern&#xD;
Ireland, is presented here together with a preview of some of the major changes&#xD;
that will be occurring in the decades ahead. The emphasis is on the structural&#xD;
changes that occurred rather than an evaluation of the policies pursued but&#xD;
many of the issues raised are relevant to the debate about the expected&#xD;
changes in the financial sector in the 1990s. A wide range of publications on Irish&#xD;
banking has been drawn upon, many of which are cited in the Bibliography.&#xD;
The review is divided into three parts. Part I concentrates on the historical&#xD;
background and outlines the origins and development of money and banking in&#xD;
Ireland up to the middle of this century. Part II concentrates on the significant&#xD;
changes in banking and other financial institutions that have occurred in Ireland&#xD;
in recent decades, including the 1980s. Finally, Part III looks towards the twenty&#xD;
first century and integration within Europe with the emphasis on prudential&#xD;
supervision of banks, other financial institutions and the capital markets.
Description: Read before the Society, 1 December, 1988</summary>
    <dc:date>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Common agricultural policy reform and national compensation strategies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2860" />
    <author>
      <name>Matthews, Alan</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2860</id>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:55:28Z</updated>
    <published>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Common agricultural policy reform and national compensation strategies
Author: Matthews, Alan
Abstract: While providing income support to producers the Common Agricultural Policy&#xD;
also redistributes resources between EC member states. As a net agricultural&#xD;
exporter Ireland is a significant recipient of resource transfers in this way. Irish&#xD;
strategy in the past has been to maximise these transfers by supporting as high a&#xD;
level of price support under the CAP as possible. A reduction in agricultural&#xD;
support is one of the objectives of the Uruguay Round of GATT negotiations now&#xD;
underway. If successful, this would adversely affect the size of the transfers&#xD;
provided through the CAP. This paper quantifies the benefit to Ireland from the&#xD;
CAP in recent years and looks at possible compensation options if CAP transfers&#xD;
were reduced.&#xD;
It argues that switching resources from CAP to non-CAP spending within the EC&#xD;
budget could leave this country better off in real terms while also being desirable&#xD;
on other grounds.
Description: Read before the Society, 10 November, 1988</summary>
    <dc:date>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Public enterprise in Ireland: a statistical description and analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2859" />
    <author>
      <name>Sweeney, Paul</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2859</id>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:55:32Z</updated>
    <published>1990-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Public enterprise in Ireland: a statistical description and analysis
Author: Sweeney, Paul
Abstract: There is much debate on the role of public enterprises, but little analytical&#xD;
work has been done on the subject in Ireland. Fitzgerald (1961),&#xD;
Bristow (1964/65, 1968, 1969 and 1982), Jacobson (1978), the National&#xD;
Economic and Social Council (1980), Dorgan (1984 and 1986),&#xD;
the Joint Oireachtas Committee on State Sponsored Bodies (October,&#xD;
1986), McDowell (1987), Walsh (1987) and Sweeney (1988a) have undertaken&#xD;
studies, the majority of which have been largely descriptive, and&#xD;
there also have been individual case studies of enterprises, for example,&#xD;
on Aer Lingus (O'Donoghue, 1968/69), Bord na Mona (Bristow and Fell,&#xD;
1971), the ESB, (Roche, 1978) (Manning and McDowell, 1984), NET&#xD;
(Blackwell et al., 1983). In addition there have been institutional examinations&#xD;
of enterprises, the most important of which are the reports of the&#xD;
Joint Oireachtas Committee on State Sponsored Bodies (JOCSSB) on&#xD;
individual enterprises, and there have been government sponsored consultant&#xD;
examinations, for example, McKinsey on CIE (1971 and 1980), and&#xD;
Fletcher (1971) and Jakobsen (1984) on the ESB.
Description: Read before the Society, 15 February, 1990</summary>
    <dc:date>1990-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Is Irish public sector employment a burden?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2858" />
    <author>
      <name>O'Riordan, William K.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/2858</id>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:55:28Z</updated>
    <published>1990-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Is Irish public sector employment a burden?
Author: O'Riordan, William K.
Abstract: In Ireland at the time of writing, strenuous efforts are being made to&#xD;
reduce the numbers at work in the public sector. Employment cuts of&#xD;
one form or another in health, education and public administration make&#xD;
news almost daily. This is not altogether surprising, since Irish economists&#xD;
have, for a generation, been warning of the disasters which are likely to be&#xD;
caused by the growth of public sector employment. As a result, it came&#xD;
to be believed that the Irish public sector was much too big and growing&#xD;
at an almost uncontrollable rate. The consequences of this were expected&#xD;
to be high unemployment, reduced employment in the non-government&#xD;
sectors, and a slowing of economic growth. The main reason for these&#xD;
effects was held to be the unbearable tax burden imposed by the public&#xD;
sector. However, the growing political power of the public sector and the&#xD;
draining of talent from the 'productive1 private sector were also feared.
Description: Read before the Society, 26 October, 1989</summary>
    <dc:date>1990-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

