<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection: Law School (Theses and Dissertations)</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/103" />
  <subtitle>Law School (Theses and Dissertations)</subtitle>
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/103</id>
  <updated>2013-05-24T01:29:53Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-24T01:29:53Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>The Evidence of Child Witnesses - Where Rules of Evidence and the Constitution Collide</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/40110" />
    <author>
      <name>Casey, Rachel</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/40110</id>
    <updated>2010-06-12T02:01:59Z</updated>
    <published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The Evidence of Child Witnesses - Where Rules of Evidence and the Constitution Collide
Author: Casey, Rachel
Abstract: This thesis explores the development and reform of particular aspects of the law of evidence&#xD;
relating to child witnesses as informed by the changing orthodoxy advanced by psychologists&#xD;
-  and adopted by the law - regarding, in particular, the capabilities and reliability of children&#xD;
as witnesses. Three principal areas of the law of evidence relating to children are scrutinised,&#xD;
namely: (i) the competence of children as witnesses; (ii) the corroboration requirements&#xD;
attaching to the evidence of children; and (iii) the examination of child witnesses and the&#xD;
statutory ’special measures’ designed to facilitate the reception of evidence from such&#xD;
witnesses.</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

